Oh yes, he said it. George Galloway,
The Respect MP a gigantic git, said it would be morally justified for a suicide bomber to murder Tony Blair. From
the Independent:
In an interview with GQ magazine, the reporter asked him: "Would the assassination of, say, Tony Blair by a suicide bomber - if there were no other casualties - be justified as revenge for the war on Iraq?"
Mr Galloway replied: "Yes, it would be morally justified. I am not calling for it - but if it happened it would be of a wholly different moral order to the events of 7/7. It would be entirely logical and explicable. And morally equivalent to ordering the deaths of thousands of innocent people in Iraq - as Blair did."
Lovely sentiment huh? I have no comments to make on this story. I just find Galloway abhorrent and perverse, and thought I'd share yet more proof of that fact.
1 comments:
Galloway appears to be a man starved of character and integrity and desperately seeking identity. Such people like Galloway, Cindy Sheehan, Michael Movieman, Jesse Jackson and an equally insidious former US Attorney General are driven to extremes to compensate for their failures. As a result they become witting and willing pawns to any element wanting to harm the images of democracies. That they are played like violins by the very people to whom they're alligning, means little. That their buffoonery is exploited and, most surely, a token of ridicule even by their new-found associates
is discarded as their mercenary character and quest for identity is all that matters to them.
Without clinical credentials, I'll say no more.
Post a Comment