God Rest Ye, Merry Gentlemen - Jars of Clay - listen now

Showing posts with label Iraq. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iraq. Show all posts

Monday, December 15, 2008

If An Arab Throws A Shoe And You Don't Consider It Insulting Is His Dog Barefoot?

Shoe Insult Against Bush Resounds In Arab World
A day after an Iraqi television journalist threw his shoes at President George W. Bush at a news conference here Sunday, his act of defiance toward the American commander in chief reverberated throughout Iraq and across the Arab world. [...]

Hitting someone with a shoe is a deep insult in the Arab world, signifying that the person being struck is as low as the dirt underneath the sole of a shoe. Compounding the insult were Zaidi's words as he hurled his footwear: "This is a gift from the Iraqis; this is the farewell kiss, you dog!" While calling someone a dog is universally harsh, among Arabs, who traditionally consider dogs unclean, those words were an even stronger slight.
Whatever blows their hair back.

Read more...

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Did Obama Treat Our Troops As Political Pawns?

Obama Tried To Stall GIS' Iraq Withdrawal
WHILE campaigning in public for a speedy withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, Sen. Barack Obama has tried in private to persuade Iraqi leaders to delay an agreement on a draw-down of the American military presence.

According to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, Obama made his demand for delay a key theme of his discussions with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad in July.

"He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington," Zebari said in an interview.

Obama insisted that Congress should be involved in negotiations on the status of US troops - and that it was in the interests of both sides not to have an agreement negotiated by the Bush administration in its "state of weakness and political confusion."

"However, as an Iraqi, I prefer to have a security agreement that regulates the activities of foreign troops, rather than keeping the matter open." Zebari says.
This story shouldn't really be surprising since it wouldn't be the first time a Democrat may have used our military for shady purposes. It'll be interesting to see if it gets followed up on or gets buried in the financial "crisis" brouhaha. If Obama did this - and there is a credible source saying he did - then it's out and out meddling in foreign affairs for his own personal political gain at best, treasonous at worst.

Read more...

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Hitch Looks Back On The Battle Of Iraq

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Read more...

Monday, June 16, 2008

The House Of Representatives Says "Mo' Money? You Got It"

Democrats To Back Down On Iraq War Conditions
Democrats in the Congress, who came to power last year on a call to end the combat in Iraq, will soon give President George W. Bush the last war-funding bill of his presidency without any of the conditions they sought for withdrawing U.S. troops, congressional aides said on Monday.
ADVERTISEMENT

Lawmakers are arranging to send Bush $165 billion in new money for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, enough to last for about a year and well beyond when Bush leaves office on January 20.

This Democrat majority hasn't been bad at all.

Read more...

Thursday, June 12, 2008

We're Fighting Them There So We Don't Have To Fight Them At The Corner of Peachtree Street And North Avenue

From Ann Coulter:
It is unquestionable that Bush has made this country safe by keeping Islamic lunatics pinned down fighting our troops in Iraq. In the past few years, our brave troops have killed more than 20,000 al-Qaida and other Islamic militants in Iraq alone. That's 20,000 terrorists who will never board a plane headed for JFK -- or a landmark building, for that matter.

We are, in fact, fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them at, say, the corner of 72nd and Columbus in Manhattan -- the mere mention of which never fails to enrage liberals, which is why you should say it as often as possible.

The Iraq war has been a stunning success. The Iraqi army is "standing up" (as they say), fat Muqtada al-Sadr --the Dr. Phil of Islamofascist radicalism -- has waddled off in retreat to Iran, and Sadr City and Basra are no longer war zones. Our servicemen must be baffled by the constant nay-saying coming from their own country.

Read more...

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Six Flags Over Baghdad

U.S. Company Building Amusement Park in Baghdad

Read more...

Monday, February 25, 2008

McCain Confuses Me Again...

I thought the main reason conservatives should to jump on the McCain Train was because our straight talkin' maverick would win because of his stance on the war? Now John "Eff-Ew" McCain says it could cost him the election.
McCain Says He Could Lose Over War Issue

John McCain said Monday that to win the White House he must convince a war-weary country that U.S. policy in Iraq is succeeding. If he can't, "then I lose. I lose," the Republican said.
Why is this man winning the nomination?

Read more...

Friday, January 18, 2008

White Flags Flying

Anti-war Groups Retreat On Funding Fight
After a series of legislative defeats in 2007 that saw the year end with more U.S. troops in Iraq than when it began, a coalition of anti-war groups is backing away from its multimillion-dollar drive to cut funding for the war and force Congress to pass timelines for bringing U.S. troops home.

In recognition of hard political reality, the groups instead will lower their sights and push for legislation to prevent President Bush from entering into a long-term agreement with the Iraqi government that could keep significant numbers of troops in Iraq for years to come.
I didn't think the Surrender crowd would ever...well...surrender!

Read more...

Saturday, December 22, 2007

Harry "Retractable" Reid

On April 19, 2007 Mr. Reid said:


On December 21, 2007 Mr. Reid admitted:


Now don't think for a minute that he's changed his mind or is going to stop his partisan demeaning of our troops and what they're accomplishing. He's still full of criticism and is looking for any little thing he can find to discredit the President and the advances our military has made in Iraq. Still, it is nice to hear him say he's wrong, isn't it?

Read more...

Monday, December 3, 2007

Harry Reid: A Sad, Silly Man

Reid Pushes Back On Iraq Optimism
Democrats are increasingly bailing on their previously held view that the troop surge in Iraq has been a "failure," but Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid isn't ready to jump on the bandwagon with other Democrats who say the surge has worked.

The Senate re-opened for business on Monday after a two-week Thanksgiving break, during which key Democrats traveled to Iraq and declared that the surge is working, at least from a security and military perspective. Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), one the top war critics, stunned fellow Democrats late last week with his statement that "the surge is working," even though he added that political reconciliation has been lagging. [emphasis mine: QC] Murtha's view was backed by Rep. Norm Dicks (D-Wash.), who also said the surge worked after he returned from Iraq.

But Reid, in a Monday press conference, ceded no ground.

"The surge hasn't accomplished its goals," Reid said. "... We're involved, still, in an intractable civil war."
Did you get that? Even John Murtha says the surge is working. No one says Iraq is now a paradise, but the new strategy is working. Poor Harry Reid is a political buffoon.

Read more...

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

The Clinton 'Waffle' House

Bill Clinton Tells Iowans: I 'Opposed Iraq' From Start
Showing inconsistency on an issue that has dogged his wife, former President Bill Clinton told Iowa Democrats on Tuesday that he "opposed (war in) Iraq from the beginning." [...]

But the former president's opposition to the war has not been clear from the start. Like his wife, Clinton has been critical of the Iraq war in recent months, but in the past gave President Bush the benefit of the doubt.

"I supported the president when he asked for authority to stand up against weapons of mass destruction in Iraq," he said in May 2003, the same year he was quoted praising Bush's handling of the war.

In a June 2004 article in Time magazine, Clinton also suggested that he would have acted the same way Bush did.illary Clinton,

"So, you're sitting there as president, you're reeling in the aftermath of (Sept. 11), so, yeah, you want to go get (Usama) bin Laden and do Afghanistan and all that. But you also have to say, 'Well, my first responsibility now is to try everything possible to make sure that this terrorist network and other terrorist networks cannot reach chemical and biological weapons or small amounts of fissile material. I've got to do that.' That's why I supported the Iraq thing," he is quoted telling the magazine.

Sen. Clinton voted to authorize the war in Iraq, and has not apologized for her decision despite attacks from war opponents Sen. Barack Obama and John Edwards.
Are there really people out there - who can vote! - that are ill-informed or dumb enough to buy into this sort of flip-flopping crap?

Read more...

Thursday, November 22, 2007

Very Good News From Iraq

Some news to be truly thankful for today:
Violence in Iraq has fallen at a rate that has surprised military commanders and even one of the architects of the “surge” that boosted US troop numbers in the country this year, according to figures gathered by the US.

The figures show the numbers of suicide attacks, roadside bombings, mortar and other attacks on US forces and on the Iraqi population have more than halved since 30,000 extra troops in June. [...]

The US military says the number of civilian deaths has also fallen 60 per cent since the surge took effect, with a drop of 75 per cent in Baghdad. According to icasualties.org, the average monthly US death toll dropped from 96 for the first half of 2007 to 66 in the past four months. The average monthly death toll for Iraqi civilians and security forces has dropped from 2,157 to 1,223 in the same period.
Are all things going splendily? No; there is still a fair amount of Shiite-on-Shiite and Sunni-on-Sunni violence, and there are delicate cease-fires in place that must be carefully handled. So, should our optimism be cautious? Yes; but the surge is working and violence is retreating faster than expected. Let's pray it stays that way. Iraqis are realizing that their future is in their own hands and they must wrest control from the fanatics and Islamofascists who have been using them for their own evil purpose.

While I applaud George W. Bush's firm stance on not giving up in Iraq, if only our stubborn President had listened to the people telling him to take action like this years ago we might be celebrating today as a homecoming for more of our troops.

Read more...

Thursday, November 15, 2007

They Should Be Charged With Nothing Less Than Sedition And Treason

Via Fox News:
OLYMPIA, Wash — At least three more protesters were arrested Sunday as demonstrations continued against shipments of military cargo through the Port of Olympia.

Others were sprayed with pepper spray by police as they tried to block trucks hauling equipment to Fort Lewis after it was unloaded from a ship carrying the gear back from Iraq.
The cowards used their own children as shields.

Via The Seattle Times:
Activists protesting military shipments at the Port of Olympia poured cement over railroad tracks to try to block shipments coming out of the Port today, according to Olympia police.
This is outrageous and goes far beyond the bounds of the right of peaceful protest; it is active interference with the defense of our nation and open rebellion against our government. It should be met with the most severe punishment available for sedition and treason.

Read more...

Saturday, October 6, 2007

The Crystal Spirit

Read more...

Friday, September 28, 2007

Another One Bites The Dust...

Senior Al Qaeda In Iraq Leader Killed By U.S. Forces
WASHINGTON — U.S.-led forces have killed one of the most important leaders of Al Qaeda in Iraq, a Tunisian believed connected to the kidnapping and killings last summer of American soldiers, a top commander said Friday.

Brig. Gen. Joseph Anderson said the death of the terrorist in a U.S. airstrike Tuesday south of Baghdad, and recent similar operations against Al Qaeda, have left the organization in Iraq fractured.

"Abu Usama al-Tunisi was one of the most senior leaders ... the emir of foreign terrorists in Iraq and part of the inner leadership circle," Anderson said.
Good, good news. Now go get some more of the bastards!

Read more...

Sunday, September 23, 2007

The New York Times Caught With Its Partisan Panties Down...Again...Surprise...

Clark Hoyt, the New York Times Public Editor has a column in today's paper titled Betraying Its Own Best Interests. In it he takes the Old Faded Lady to task for violating her own policies and procedures in both the price charged and the content of the Moveon.org ad that attacked the honor and integrity of General David H. Petraeus:
FOR nearly two weeks, The New York Times has been defending a political advertisement that critics say was an unfair shot at the American commander in Iraq.

But I think the ad violated The Times’ own written standards, and the paper now says that the advertiser got a price break it was not entitled to. [ed. note: emphasis mine.]

On Monday, Sept. 10, the day that Gen. David H. Petraeus came before Congress to warn against a rapid withdrawal of troops, The Times carried a full-page ad attacking his truthfulness. [...]

Did MoveOn.org get favored treatment from The Times? And was the ad outside the bounds of acceptable political discourse?

The answer to the first question is that MoveOn.org paid what is known in the newspaper industry as a standby rate of $64,575 that it should not have received under Times policies. The group should have paid $142,083. The Times had maintained for a week that the standby rate was appropriate, but a company spokeswoman told me late Thursday afternoon that an advertising sales representative made a mistake. [ed. note: emphasis mine.]

The answer to the second question is that the ad appears to fly in the face of an internal advertising acceptability manual that says, “We do not accept opinion advertisements that are attacks of a personal nature.” Steph Jespersen, the executive who approved the ad, said that, while it was “rough,” he regarded it as a comment on a public official’s management of his office and therefore acceptable speech for The Times to print.
You can read the rest for yourself. It's full of quotes from staffers and big-wigs like "we made a mistake" and "it's contrary to our policies"; big surprise right? Is the New York Times not tired of getting caught being blatantly partisan, blatantly wrong, and blatantly anti-American? I mean WTF? Does Ahmadinejad have compromising photos of Pinch Sulzberger and Maureen Dowd? Jeebus, come on folks!

Speaking of Pinch, what did he have to say about the brouhaha? Get this: Sulzberger, who said he wasn’t aware of MoveOn.org’s latest ad until it appeared in the paper, said: “If we’re going to err, it’s better to err on the side of more political dialogue. ... Perhaps we did err in this case. If we did, we erred with the intent of giving greater voice to people.”

Perhaps you erred?! Greater voice?! Oh good grief. In the words of my generation, "gag me with a spoon."

Hoyt closed by saying:
For me, two values collided here: the right of free speech — even if it’s abusive speech — and a strong personal revulsion toward the name-calling and personal attacks that now pass for political dialogue, obscuring rather than illuminating important policy issues. For The Times, there is another value: the protection of its brand as a newspaper that sets a high standard for civility. Were I in Jespersen’s shoes, I’d have demanded changes to eliminate “Betray Us,” a particularly low blow when aimed at a soldier.
Perhaps Mr. Hoyt deserves a promotion, but I wonder how long his job will last now?

Read more...

Thursday, September 6, 2007

Protecting Their Investment In Defeat

Democrats Already Discount War Report
Congressional Democrats are trying to undermine U.S. Army Gen. David H. Petraeus' credibility before he delivers a report on the Iraq war next week, saying the general is a mouthpiece for President Bush and his findings can't be trusted.

"The Bush report?" Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin said when asked about the upcoming report from Gen. Petraeus, U.S. commander in Iraq.

"We know what is going to be in it. It's clear. I think the president's trip over to Iraq makes it very obvious," the Illinois Democrat said. "I expect the Bush report to say, 'The surge is working. Let's have more of the same.' "

The top Democrats — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California — also referred to the general's briefing as the "Bush report."

Rep. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said Gen. Petraeus' report was potentially compromised by the White House's involvement in drafting it.

"If the same people who were so wrong about this war from the start are writing substantial portions of this report, that raises credibility questions," he said.
Are we really surprised by this? To admit that there has been any progress whatsoever would be political suicide for those Democrats who have hitched their political wagons to the idea of "defeat" in Iraq. So it's no longer a report from General Petraeus on the successes and/or setbacks of the surge, it is now "Bush's Report" (insert eerie conspiratorial music here), and therefore in the eyes of Democrats it can have no value whatsoever. Fortunately, some in the opposition are having none of it:
Republicans bristled at the pre-emptive strike against the report.

"Are these leaders asking the American people to believe that the testimony of a commanding four-star general in the U.S. Army should be discarded before it's even delivered?" said Brian Kennedy, spokesman for House Minority Leader John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican.

"If so, these statements completely ignore what's truly at stake in this war and suggest that neither the commander in chief nor our chief commander on the ground have any regard for the lives of the men and women fighting for this country," he said. "It's appallng, and I think the American people — rightfully — will continue to stick by the decisions of our commanders and troops on the ground when it comes to what is best for their safety and security."
Oh, and never mind all the "we support the troops, but not their mission" crap spouted by the left. When it comes time to make political hay, they are quite happy to throw our fighting men and women under the bus, just as Senator Chuck Schumer did:
“And let me be clear, the violence in Anbar has gone down despite the surge, not because of the surge. The inability of American soldiers to protect these tribes from al Qaeda said to these tribes we have to fight al Qaeda ourselves. It wasn’t that the surge brought peace here. It was that the warlords took peace here, created a temporary peace here.”


Oh, and Senator Schumer has modified his anti-surge rehtoric. It seems his website and the video of his speech disagree about what was said. As usually happens, the Democrats get utterly surprised when the American people react angrily to their smear tactics against their country and it's troops...ergo he has deleted those remarks and I'm sure all his memories of ever uttering them. Sweetness & Light details Schumer's revisionist antics. What a shameful man Schumer is.

Now I'm not saying that the surge has been perfect, or that every goal has been met, but for God's sake, shut the fuck up until the details of the report have been delivered and then let's have a debate about what has worked, what hasn't, and what we need to do for the future. Unfortunately...the Democrats can't afford that kind of risk, so expect them to come out like a Michael Vick pitbull, attacking anyone and anything that hints of any good news out of Iraq. It's sad, and it's contemptible, and it's Democratic politics as usual.

Read more...

Friday, July 20, 2007

The Left Keeps Talking Nonsense...

Nonsense like "the 'War on Terror' is a bumper sticker myth, but we've made the myth dangerous by invading Iraq. Al Qaeda isn't in Iraq, but the country is one of their primary operating bases. Al Qaeda wasn't dangerous until we started fighting them."

But what about all the attacks that happened before the toppling of Saddam, you say? Look, don't go rocking the "peace" boat you "rethuglican" warmonger you! Just ignore the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the 1998 bombing of our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and the attack on the USS Cole. Not to mention all the countless terrorist attacks in the 1970s and 1980s. Those were all coincidences; just completely random and unrelated acts of madmen. By the way, if you buy their nonsense, the moonbats have a bridge for sale in San Francisco if you're interested. Oops, my bad; I forgot that capitalism is evil and the bridge is "communal" property.

Now, I have no problem with the loony left putting themselves in harms way with their stupidity, but they're dragging the rest of us along with them; and that pisses me off. Ann Coulter put it nicely when she said: "Usually the nonsense liberals spout is kind of cute, but in wartime their instinctive idiocy is life-threatening." Ann weighs in on the left's suicidal tendencies in her latest column, "The 'Bumper Sticker' That Blows Up".

Read more...

Sunday, July 15, 2007

Senators Webb and Graham "Discuss" Iraq

Now I totally disagree with Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC) on immigration. He's dead wrong on how to handle the situation and he needs to stop trying to be John McCain Junior and find his own voice again; but I agree with him on Iraq. Senator Jim Webb (D-VA), however, is an asshole. That has nothing to do with his politics, it's just an obvious personality flaw. Look at Webb trying not to blow his top. He just about can't keep his temper. Whatta dick.


Read more...

Wednesday, November 17, 2004

War in Fallujah

How can we possibly pass judgement on the young US Marine for doing what he felt was necessary in a life or death battle.

We know it is common for Islamofascist insurgents to fake being dead in order to draw coalition troops close enough to them to detonate homicide bombs or draw hidden weapons to try and get just one more soldier before the head off to "paradise." Here's a sample from the story linked above:
Gagging amid the overpowering stench of rotting flesh, the Iraqis had to take special care because of the danger that insurgents have booby-trapped some bodies with explosives. On one stoop, the Iraqis pushed over a corpse and a grenade rolled out of its pocket. The weapon didn't detonate, but Marines quickly hurried the workers away.
Andrew Sullivan has this to say on his blog:
The video is grim enough; and if the marine in question is found guilty of violating rules of conduct, then he should face punishment. But I have to say I cannot stand in judgment of this young man, after what must have been brutal, terrifying days of urban conflict. This is surely what they call "what happens in wartime." It may not be morally defensible; but it is psychologically understandable. Franly, I'm grateful for what this man, half my age, is doing with his fellows in unspeakably terrifying circumstances. Compare his action with Abu Ghraib, and you can see the difference. One a snap judgment in a furious battle context; the other a pre-meditated example of abuse and murder of prisoners in U.S. custody.

In short, war really is hell and we can never ever know what sort of pressure our brave soldiers are experiencing. We most certainly cannot and should not judge the Marine's actions without the most overwhelming evidence of a misdeed.
For a taste of actual barbarity, please see the following from the Times of London:
In the south of Fallujah yesterday, US Marines found the armless, legless body of a blonde woman, her throat slashed and her entrails cut out. Benjamin Finnell, a hospital apprentice with the US Navy Corps, said that she had been dead for a while, but at that location for only a day or two. The woman was wearing a blue dress; her face had been disfigured. It was unclear if the remains were the body of the Irish-born aid worker Margaret Hassan, 59, or of Teresa Borcz, 54, a Pole abducted two weeks ago. Both were married to Iraqis and held Iraqi citizenship; both were kidnapped in Baghdad last month.

US and Iraqi troops have discovered kidnappers’ lairs filled with corpses or emaciated prisoners half-mad with fear, and piles of bodies of men who had refused to fight with the insurgents. As the guerrillas run their last sprint from death, sympathy for their cause is running out among Iraqis.
What do I think of the Marine's actions? Based on the information that we have at this time, I say any world with one less terrorist is a very GOOD world.

Read more...

Recent Comments

Contact Me

eMail:
cyberkevinblogs@gmail.com

MSN:
cyberkevinblogs

Google Chat:
cyberkevin1
Powered By Blogger

Label Cloud

Followers

. . .

. . .

. . .


stats

Blog Archive

Disclaimer

All opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author. The author’s opinions do not represent those of his employers. All original material is copyrighted and property of the author. If you use it at least have the decency to give me credit for it. Don’t steal it or I reserve the right to sue you to heck and back, or worse. Other info may have been copyrighted by someone else; the author believes that such work as is quoted here does not exceed reasonable “fair use” of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the United States Copyright Law as I understand it. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Opinions in comments or trackbacks are not mine, so if you have a problem with those, sorry, I can’t help you. Comments on this blog become the sole property of the blog, and may be reused or quoted on the blog or in any other media. Anyone mentioned in relation to a crime is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Contact: writetokevinp@gmail.com. All e-mails are presumed to be for publication on the site unless I am specifically and politely told otherwise - if you’re rude I’ll publish them just to hack you off. All comments are subject to deletion or revision should the author find them offensive or just simply not like you. Trolling will not be tolerated.

  © Blogger templates ProBlogger Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP