Again (and Again) I Agree With Ann Coulter
Money Snipets:
... he [Bush] could nominate his Scottish terrier Barney, and some conservatives would rush to defend him, claiming to be in possession of secret information convincing them that the pooch is a true conservative and listing Barney's many virtues — loyalty, courage, never jumps on the furniture ...
To casually spurn the people who have been taking slings and arrows all these years and instead reward the former commissioner of the Texas Lottery with a Supreme Court appointment is like pinning a medal of honor on some flunky paper-pusher with a desk job at the Pentagon — or on John Kerry — while ignoring your infantrymen doing the fighting and dying.
Second, even if you take seriously William F. Buckley's line about preferring to be governed by the first 200 names in the Boston telephone book than by the Harvard faculty, the Supreme Court is not supposed to govern us. Being a Supreme Court justice ought to be a mind-numbingly tedious job suitable only for super-nerds trained in legal reasoning like John Roberts. Being on the Supreme Court isn't like winning a "Best Employee of the Month" award. It's a real job.
3 comments:
I love the blind ignorance of the gay left, especially Mr. Quicksand. I agree that good ole' Ann made a valid point, as she normally does. The one thing I like about Ann is that she spares no shame.
All you have to do to attract them is say that you agree with anything that Ann Coulter says. I find it exhilarating.
I find his name appropriate: "quicksand." That's what most of the left's logic is built on.
Not to mention that the left now finds itself in the awkward position of defending a Bush nominee.
Will wonders never cease?
Post a Comment