God Rest Ye, Merry Gentlemen - Jars of Clay - listen now

Wednesday, November 16, 2005


Are the morons at the New York Times really this out of touch? Another blathering sycophant for totalitarianism, Nicholas Kristof, has decided that "Mao's Legacy Is Not All Bad."

"My own sense is that Mao, however monstrous, also brought useful changes to China….But Mao’s legacy is not all bad. Land reform in China, like the land reform in Japan and Taiwan, helped lay the groundwork for prosperity today. The emancipation of women and end of child marriages moved China from one of the worst places in the world to be a girl to one where women have more equality than in, say, Japan or Korea. Indeed, Mao’s entire assault on the old economic and social structure made it easier for China to emerge as the world’s new economic dragon….In the same way, I think, Mao's ruthlessness was a catastrophe at the time, brilliantly captured in this extraordinary book -- and yet there's more to the story: Mao also helped lay the groundwork for the rebirth and rise of China after five centuries of slumber." -- Foreign policy reporter turned columnist Nicholas Kristof reviewing a new Mao biography in the October 23 Book Review

There's always "more to the story" for a liberal isn't there? God forbid something just be plain "good" or "bad", "right" or "wrong." With columnists spouting off about the good points of totalitarian thugs, The Old Gray Lady's circulation will keep on plummeting, except perhaps in Beijing.

Let's break it out for Nicholas like he's four years old shall we? Nicholas, listen carefully: Mao was a bad, bad man, even if he did make the trains run on time. He killed millions of people. That is very, very wrong. Understand? Genocide is not good. Mmkay? Now run out to the kitchen and see if there's a grown-up conservative that can fix you some milk and cookies, you little whipper-snapper.

[HT: TimesWatch.org]


Recent Comments

Contact Me



Google Chat:

Label Cloud


. . .

. . .

. . .


Blog Archive


All opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author. The author’s opinions do not represent those of his employers. All original material is copyrighted and property of the author. If you use it at least have the decency to give me credit for it. Don’t steal it or I reserve the right to sue you to heck and back, or worse. Other info may have been copyrighted by someone else; the author believes that such work as is quoted here does not exceed reasonable “fair use” of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the United States Copyright Law as I understand it. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Opinions in comments or trackbacks are not mine, so if you have a problem with those, sorry, I can’t help you. Comments on this blog become the sole property of the blog, and may be reused or quoted on the blog or in any other media. Anyone mentioned in relation to a crime is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Contact: writetokevinp@gmail.com. All e-mails are presumed to be for publication on the site unless I am specifically and politely told otherwise - if you’re rude I’ll publish them just to hack you off. All comments are subject to deletion or revision should the author find them offensive or just simply not like you. Trolling will not be tolerated.

  © Blogger templates ProBlogger Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP