God Rest Ye, Merry Gentlemen - Jars of Clay - listen now

Wednesday, November 16, 2005

TEACHER RESIGNS AFTER SHOWING "R" RATED MOVIE

Let's grow up people, it was a movie about Queen Elizabeth I - not "Boogie Nights." It was shown to a Senior Honors English class not a bunch of freshman. A class of men and women about to go to college next fall are certainly capable of watching and understanding a historical movie - nudity, sex and all. From the Associated Press:
SNELLVILLE (Georgia) -- A South Gwinnett High School teacher has resigned after he showed the R-rated movie "Elizabeth" to his students without following proper school procedures.

Ed Youngblood, who had taught at the school for 37 years, showed the 1998 Oscar-winning film about Britain's Queen Elizabeth I in his senior honors English class. It is rated "R" for violence, nudity and sexuality.

Youngblood resigned shortly after the school launched an investigation after several students' parents complained.

"Mr. Youngblood did not ask for a local review of the film prior to showing it, nor did he allow parents the option of opting their students out of the viewing," said Sloan
Roach, Gwinnett Public Schools spokeswoman.

But Youngblood said the school forced him to resign.

Teachers must submit instructional materials that are not approved to a school committee for review, according to the school system's policy. The committee also determines whether parental permission is needed before teachers present the materials.

Youngblood retired from South Gwinnett last year, but returned to teach three classes part-time.

Former and current students have coordinated an effort to get Youngblood reinstated.

"Such a wonderful teacher should not be forced to give up something that he is so passionate about," former student Matthew Campbell said. "Not to mention the number of students that would be deprived of his tutelage."
Come on, his students can correctly use the world "tutelage" in a sentence. Give him a raise for God's sake, the man is a good teacher.

Did he follow the proper guidelines for showing movies like this? No. Should he have? Yes. Was a resignation really necessary? No. This "faux" prudishness that is ingrained in the American sensibility is hypocritical and quite useless.

And afterall, it's not like he was teaching the "music" of Tupac as literature (forget "Man vs. Self," "Man vs. Nature," and "Man vs. Society" try "Man vs. Ho") - now that would have been a travesty.

3 comments:

Stephen in Atlanta 11/16/2005 11:07:00 AM  

All the parents who got their panties in a wad need to go back and live during the Victorian era if they want to be such prudes. I mean, come on, a SENIOR HONORS class.

RubyWatermelon 11/16/2005 08:52:00 PM  

Perhaps they were planning on sending their children to Mercer. Uh-oh they might see gay people...Way to go Gahhhja!!

Bolibuckness 11/20/2005 11:34:00 PM  

As a former student of Ed, I find this quite tragic. Did he go through the proper paperwork to get "approval?" The man's been teaching for 37 years, probably showing that very film since it released in class without even a blushed face (I don't recall any nudity . . . which suggests that's not a focus of the film anyway). I've not talked to Ed yet, and will in the morning, but: this is a consequence of something else altogether, the film is obviously a ruse.

Recent Comments

Contact Me

eMail:
cyberkevinblogs@gmail.com

MSN:
cyberkevinblogs

Google Chat:
cyberkevin1

Label Cloud

Followers

. . .

. . .

. . .


stats

Blog Archive

Disclaimer

All opinions expressed on this blog are those of the author. The author’s opinions do not represent those of his employers. All original material is copyrighted and property of the author. If you use it at least have the decency to give me credit for it. Don’t steal it or I reserve the right to sue you to heck and back, or worse. Other info may have been copyrighted by someone else; the author believes that such work as is quoted here does not exceed reasonable “fair use” of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the United States Copyright Law as I understand it. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Opinions in comments or trackbacks are not mine, so if you have a problem with those, sorry, I can’t help you. Comments on this blog become the sole property of the blog, and may be reused or quoted on the blog or in any other media. Anyone mentioned in relation to a crime is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Contact: writetokevinp@gmail.com. All e-mails are presumed to be for publication on the site unless I am specifically and politely told otherwise - if you’re rude I’ll publish them just to hack you off. All comments are subject to deletion or revision should the author find them offensive or just simply not like you. Trolling will not be tolerated.

  © Blogger templates ProBlogger Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP